![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 209
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 65, of which the discussed bar is a literal repetition, the shift of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 216
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 72, in the main text we suggest adding a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 217-218
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 220
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 76, the dyad of the bottom voice (e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
|||||
b. 222
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The change of the wedge to a staccato dot is probably a revision of GE, in which the wedge, absent both in the preceding R.H. and L.H. figures and in the identical figure in b. 226, was considered a mistake. Indeed, a mistake of the engraver of FE at the time of interpreting [A] cannot be ruled out; however, since the repetition of this fragment (b. 242) is also provided with a wedge in FE, we keep this version, probably authentic. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Wedges |