The change of the wedge to a staccato dot is probably a revision of GE, in which the wedge, absent both in the preceding R.H. and L.H. figures and in the identical figure in b. 226, was considered a mistake. Indeed, a mistake of the engraver of FE at the time of interpreting [A] cannot be ruled out; however, since the repetition of this fragment (b. 242) is also provided with a wedge in FE, we keep this version, probably authentic.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: GE revisions, Wedges
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins