![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE revisions
b. 126
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 125, the version of GE is an arbitrary decision of the engraver, repeated in EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 126
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 128
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The fact that the version of FE (→EE1) is erroneous is proven by:
The change of this note to d was introduced in GE and – probably on the basis thereof – in EE2. The issue concerning the extension of this note – see the note above. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 129-130
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The change of the font of accents to vertical is a typical mannerism of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 129
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In EE1 the L.H. octave on the 2nd beat of the bar is an E category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Terzverschreibung error |