FE
compare
b. 176
It is the different slurring with respect to analogous b. 32 that is noteworthy. Due to the highly likely abridged notation of the reprise of the main section of the Polonaise in [A], this difference must have occurred in print, e.g. as a result of Chopin's proofreading in b. 32. In the main text we suggest adding slurs while maintaining the source slur, since it emphasises the significance of the f2 crotchet, thus kind of replacing the accent present in b. 32.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Editorial revisions
notation: Slurs