Issues : Errors in GE
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
This is the first out of two places in which the graphical retouches in the latest impression of GE1, marked in our system as GE1a, contributed to a rhythmic mistake: the quaver flag next to g2 was overlooked. GE2 (→GE3) contains the correct text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
GE overlooked pedalling in this bar, which is a patent mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 61-66
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
The easiest explanation for the absence of a mark in GE would be an oversight, although a revision also cannot be excluded. In turn, the missing mark may be authentic and does not have to be considered a mistake, since there are marks without following marks in Chopin's pieces. Despite that, in the main text we suggest [] at the end of b. 66, mostly to warn performers from earlier pedal changes. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in GE , No pedal release mark |
||||||
b. 73-74
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
The missing tie of a1 is probably a mistake, although it cannot be ruled out that the tie was omitted to give meaning to the accent under the a1 minim in b. 74. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 96
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
One cannot see the quaver flag next to the final a1 on the copy of GE1a displayed in mUltimate Chopin. According to us, it is a result of this element having been poorly imprinted due to the wear and tear of the engraving plate, hence the flag may be visible on a different copy coming from this impression. Anyway, GE2 (→GE3) include the correct text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in GE |