Page: 
Source: 
p. 12, b. 226-243
p. 1, b. 1-27
p. 2, b. 28-60
p. 3, b. 61-87
p. 4, b. 88-105
p. 5, b. 106-124
p. 6, b. 125-142
p. 7, b. 143-158
p. 8, b. 159-173
p. 9, b. 174-188
p. 10, b. 189-206
p. 11, b. 207-225
p. 12, b. 226-243
p. 13, b. 244-260
Main text
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEO - Orda copy
FES - Stirling copy
FESf - Schiffmacher copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEO - Orda copy
FES - Stirling copy
FESf - Schiffmacher copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 228

The difference in the sound of the last chord in bars 116 and 228 could have been unintended. It is indicated by lack of other harmonic differences between the exposition and reprise. Chopin could have, e.g. changed bar 116, forgetting about analogous bar 228; he was prone to such inaccuracies while performing proofreading. Therefore, we suggest here an alternative version, analogous to bar 116.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Interpretations within context

issues: Omitted correction of an analogous place

notation: Pitch

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FEO, FES, FESf, GE1, EE1, EE2, EE3