mUltimate Chopin

Op. 19, Bolero

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 33

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

..

The engraver of GE must have overlooked the wedge for the 1st quaver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 43-44

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

..

The engraver of EE1 overlooked the wedges for the first quavers in bars 43 and 44. The marks were added in EE2 (→EE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE

b. 64-66

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

..

EE1 overlooked the accent for the tied a1 crotchet in bar 64 and for c2 in bar 66. The mark was added already in EE2 (→EE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE

b. 66

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE

b. 88-89

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

Accents over L.H. in FE (→GE)

Accents under L.H. in EE1

Accents in both hands in EE2 (→EE3)
..

It is difficult to say what EE1 was guided by when moving the accents under the chords, which may suggest accenting their bottom note, instead of the top one. The addition of parallel accents under the R.H. in EE2 (→EE3) rather did not bring the notation into line with the version of FE. However, one has to remember that it is uncertain whether FE reproduces the notation of [A] in a faithful manner, thus Chopin's intention in this respect.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , EE inaccuracies