mUltimate Chopin

Op. 19, Bolero

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 199

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

No slur in FE (→GE,EE1→EE2)

Slur in EE3
 
..

In EE3, a slur combining E and the ending of the trill was arbitrariily added.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 200-206

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

..

In bars 200-245, FE (→EE) has significantly fewer performance markings than in corresponding bars 88-133. In GE, the majority of them was most probably added by the reviser. Some of them are organically related to the sound image of the music ( in the L.H. in bar 204 and analog.) or its course (a tempo in bar 230), so adding them certainly is not contrary to the composer's intentions (it cannot be excluded that Chopin accepted them himself, while reviewing GE). Therefore, in the analogous places, we repeat both the markings added in GE (in brackets) and we add a few others (in square brackets).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

b. 203-204

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

3 slurs in EE
 
..

EE arbitrarily added three slurs in the L.H., thus unifying the notation with analogous bars 91-92.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 204

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

 

[] suggested by the editors
..

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 206

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

 
 

Our variant suggestion
..

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions