Page: 
Source: 
p. 12, b. 281-308
p. 1, b. 1-32
p. 2, b. 33-69
p. 3, b. 70-92
p. 4, b. 93-112
p. 5, b. 113-136
p. 6, b. 137-170
p. 7, b. 171-195
p. 8, b. 196-220
p. 9, b. 221-240
p. 10, b. 241-260
p. 11, b. 261-280
p. 12, b. 281-308
p. 13, b. 309-334
p. 14, b. 335-366
p. 15, b. 367-398
p. 16, b. 399-424
p. 17, b. 425-445
p. 18, b. 446-466
p. 19, b. 467-487
p. 20, b. 488-514
Main text
Main text
½A - Semi-autograph
A - Autograph of the piano part
Morch - Manuscript of the orchestra part
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
½A - Semi-autograph
A - Autograph of the piano part
Morch - Manuscript of the orchestra part
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 293-297

Slurs under triplets in A

No lower slurs in GE (→FEEE)

The slur visible in A under the quaver triplet in bars 293 and 297 was most probably overlooked both in GE1 and in GE2 (it is understandable in bar 293, in which the slur blends into the  sign). We do not convey these slurs in the main text, since they seem to be triplet slurs, which we generally do not include (General Editorial Principlesp. 16), and which could have been left in A by accident. However, it is not a typical situation, hence it cannot be excluded that Chopin indeed envisaged double slurs in this place.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE, Triplet slurs

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: A, Morch, GE1, GE1a, GE2, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, EE1, EE2, EE3