mUltimate Chopin

Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 8, b. 196-220
p. 1, b. 1-32
p. 2, b. 33-69
p. 3, b. 70-92
p. 4, b. 93-112
p. 5, b. 113-136
p. 6, b. 137-170
p. 7, b. 171-195
p. 8, b. 196-220
p. 9, b. 221-240
p. 10, b. 241-260
p. 11, b. 261-280
p. 12, b. 281-308
p. 13, b. 309-334
p. 14, b. 335-366
p. 15, b. 367-398
p. 16, b. 399-424
p. 17, b. 425-445
p. 18, b. 446-466
p. 19, b. 467-487
p. 20, b. 488-514
Main text
Main text
½A - Semi-autograph
A - Autograph of the piano part
Morch - Manuscript of the orchestra part
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
½A - Semi-autograph
A - Autograph of the piano part
Morch - Manuscript of the orchestra part
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text

  b. 197-198

No L.H. slurs in A

2 slurs in GE1 (→FE→EE)

1 slur in GE2

The slurs in the L.H. added in GE1 (→FE→EE) are most probably inauthentic – the division on the bar line (after the slurs in the R.H.) certainly is not in line with Chopin's intention. Assuming that a possible Chopin proof entry in GE1 was implemented inaccurately, one could consider the slur of GE2 to be in line with his intention. However, it would be then obscure why Chopin did not order to correct the slurs in the R.H. at that time.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: A, Morch, GE1, GE1a, GE2, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, EE1, EE2, EE3
Complete ➔