Issues : Scope of dynamic hairpins
b. 237-238
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The shortened hairpin in the editions was certainly a result of inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Scope of dynamic hairpins |
||||||
b. 293-295
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
We give the hairpin in the main text on the basis of A. It is the only version whose authenticity does not raise any doubts. The musically sensible version of GE1 (→FE) may be considered an equal variant; however, it may be a result of the engraver's inaccuracy. In the version of EE and GE2 one can see an arbitrary attempt to unify the notation of GE1 (→FE) or another inaccuracy. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||
b. 297
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The absence of the hairpin in GE1 (→FE) may be an oversight of the engraver or Chopin's proofreading – see bars 293-295. The sign in EE may be a part of a revision unifying the markings after analogous bars 293 and 295. The sign in GE2 was added taking into consideration A, yet the range of the was repeated after GE1 in bar 293. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |