|
b. 346-347
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The absence of slurs must be an oversight – Chopin forgot to write slurs after passing to a new page in A. These are the most frequent mistakes committed in the Chopinesque manuscripts. Due to this reason, in the main text we suggest slurs drawn from the part of violin I in Morch, in accordance with the authentic slurring of analogous bars 22-23. The slurs of EE are almost certainly inauthentic, whereas the slur in bar 22 – certainly erroneous. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 347
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In A, the flat restoring e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Foreign hand additions in manuscripts |
||||||||
|
b. 348
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The indication Solo is present only in GE and EE; in both editions it was probably added by the revisers. The absence of the indication in FE suggests that in GE1 it was added in the last stage of proofreading. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
|
b. 349-352
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Same as in all previous similar bars, we consider the missing slurs in the L.H. in bars 349-351 to be an inaccuracy of the notation of A (→GE→FE), resulting from an increasing haste. Due to this reason, we add slurs after bars 1-3 and 25-27. In EE, in all four bars, arbitrary double slurs for each pair of dyads were introduced. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 349
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we omit the cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
is written with pencil; therefore, its authenticity is uncertain (see the 
before d