Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
|
b. 420
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In this place, the long accent was reproduced in GE1 correctly, yet in FE (→EE) it was replaced with a common short accent, whereas in GE2 – with a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 441-445
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The omission of the dashes marking the range of crescendo is probably an inaccuracy of FE (→EE), although it cannot be excluded that it was in GE1 that they were initially omitted, to be added in the last phase of proofreading. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 446-448
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we reproduce the elaborate notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 456
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The short accent in A was reproduced in GE1 as a long one, since the engravers were probably convinced that they were a diminuendo hairpin. This is how it was interpreted in FE (→EE), extending the mark to the end of the triplet, "for clarity." The form of the sign compliant with A was restored in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 462
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The missing category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , No pedal release mark , Inaccuracies in A |
in 
in 
suggested by the editors