|
b. 243-244
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Starting the slur already from the 1st crotchet in GE1 (→FE→EE) is a typical inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 243
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In FE the last chord has a quaver stem. The absence of rest, required if the chord was shortened, proves that it is a mistake, probably stemming from a misunderstanding at the time of implementing extensive proofreading of pitch and rhythmic values in bars 243-244. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors resulting from corrections |
||||||||
|
b. 243
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In A there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A |
||||||||
|
b. 244
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 244
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The change of the type of accent in GE is a very frequent inaccuracy in Chopin first editions. The absence of the accent in FE (→EE) is probably one of the mistakes committed while proofreading bars 243-244 – cf. notes in the previous bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE |
before the 1st crotchet. The patent inadvertence was corrected in 
on the 2nd beat of the bar. It must be a side effect of an inaccurately implemented proofreading of the part of the L.H. encompassing bars 243-244. The mistake was corrected in 
before f1.
