Issues : EE revisions
b. 370-376
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In FE the signs are written very carelessly in these bars – the sign in bar 370 points to the 3rd beat of the bar; the remaining ones (except for bar 373, in which FE does not have a ) fall between the 1st and 2nd beats of the bar (the last three are closer to the 1st beat). Since there are no doubts that the shifts are of a random nature, we reproduce them only in the version "transcription." category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 372
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
According to us, the course of the music suggests a possible change of the performance manner of these motifs only from the next bar. Therefore, in the main text we suggest adding an accent in the discussed place. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 373
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
GE1 (→FE) overlooked , which is a patent mistake. The sign was added in GE2, whereas in EE – and an accent (see bars 369-375), same as in the adjacent bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 376-377
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In A, the quavers in bar 376, the last on this page, are encompassed with a slur, which clearly points to continuation, yet in bar 377 there is no ending of this slur. Chopin did not write any slurs in the L.H. until the end of this Solo, hence it seems that he renounced the slurring in the L.H. in this fragment, considering the slurs in the R.H. to be enough. Due to this reason, in the main text we omit the described fragment of the slur. It may be possible that the absence of continuation of the slurring is only a result of haste, particularly since in analogous bars 32-33 the slurs in A are written in the parts of both hands. Therefore, the slur of GE1, completed after the R.H., and the slurs of EE and GE2 can be considered to be compliant with Chopin's intention. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||
b. 379-380
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
It is difficult to assume that the slurs in the L.H. appearing in GE1 (→FE) could have been added in this form by Chopin – they are contrary to the authentic slur in the R.H., whereas their range overlaps with the beams of the group of quavers. Therefore, it is most probably a revision, which also questions the authenticity of the slurs added in GE1 in the previous two bars. The revisers of EE and GE2 replaced them with a two-bar slur modelled after the slur of the R.H.; it specifies the notation, yet it does not follow from the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |