The slurs in the L.H. added in GE1 (→FE→EE) are most probably inauthentic – the division on the bar line (after the slurs in the R.H.) certainly is not in line with Chopin's intention. Assuming that a possible Chopin proof entry in GE1 was implemented inaccurately, one could consider the slur of GE2 to be in line with his intention. However, it would be then obscure why Chopin did not order to correct the slurs in the R.H. at that time.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: GE revisions
notation: Slurs
