The range of the slurs in the R.H. in bars 29-32 is beyond doubt in A, although none of them transcends the bar line (cf. the slurs in the L.H., written more accurately). One can only guess why two of those rather too short slurs were reproduced in GE1 as much longer. In FE the most deformed slur of GE1 was generalised in all three places, which is also puzzling. This unreasonable notation was repeated without changes in EE, although the slur beginning in bar 31 has no ending in bar 32 due to the transition into a new line.
GE2 restored the correctly interpreted notation of A.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in FE, Inaccuracies in GE, GE revisions, Errors repeated in EE
notation: Slurs
