Issues : Authentic corrections of GE
b. 87
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In GE1, particularly in later copies, one can see clear traces of correcting the slurs in the R.H. in the 2nd half of the bar – initially, the slur started (contrary to A) already on the 3rd beat of the bar. Apart from the trace of the original slur, one can also see distortions of the wavy line of the arpeggio, which suggests that the proofreading could have also embraced the upper part of the last chord. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of GE , Corrected slurs of Op. 21 in GE1 |
||||||||
b. 88
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Both source versions of slurring are most probably authentic. In the main text, we give separated slurs of A, yet the slur of GE (→FE→EE), being probably a result of the Chopin proofreading and compatible with the slur of analogous bar 20, can be considered an equal variant. We give priority to the version of A, since when proofreading GE1, Chopin would change the misinterpreted slurs in the edition and not the ones he wrote in A. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text we give the slurs that Chopin wrote in A, yet the slur of GE (→FE→EE) can be considered an equal variant:
category imprint: Differences between sources |