Issues : GE revisions
b. 19-20
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text we give two long accents under the chords ending these bars, since all deviations from this notation present in the editions are a result of inaccuracies or arbitrary revisions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The absence of the slur embracing the grace nots is probably a result of inattention of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The version of GE1 is certainly erroneous: it is most probably a revised Terzverschreibung error, by adding a . Chopin restored the chord with c2, written in A, in a proofreading of FE (→EE). At the time of executing this proofreading, a superfluous was moved together with the note head. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
According to us, the fact of removing the accents by Chopin in a proofreading of GE1 (→FE→EE) is less likely than them having been accidentally overlooked by the engraver (there are more similar inaccuracies, both in this and the previous bar). GE2 restored the accents (as short). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |