Issues : Long accents
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The long accent could have been introduced in FE by Chopin (cf. bars 39-40), hence we adopt it to the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The missing accent in the editions is almost certainly a result of inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1, who also overlooked slurs in this bar. Cf. bar 44 too. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 45
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The unquestionable long accent in A under the b2 quaver started in the editions (certainly contrary to Chopin's intention) clearly earlier. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||
b. 48
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The unquestionable long accent written in A was reproduced in GE as short and in FE (→EE1) it was overlooked. There seems to be no reason to attribute any of these changes to Chopin's intervention. In subsequent EE the accent was most probably added after GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||
b. 77
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The long accent in FE (→EE), not arising from the notation of A (→GE), is probably an accidental inaccuracy. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »