Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
|
b. 76
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Beginning a slur from the 1st quaver – clearly contrary to the notation of A – is a typical example of the routine approach of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE) to the issue of slurring (see the characterization of GE1). GE2 returned the notation compliant with the manuscript. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 79
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Reproducing the accent in the editions as short is certainly a result of an inaccurate interpretation of A by the engraver of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The missing small slurs next to both grace notes in this bar is almost certainly an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). The signs were added in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The overlooked staccato dot in the majority of the editions is most probably a result of an oversight of the engraver of GE1. The sign in GE2 was added after A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 83-84
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The slur embracing in A bars 83-84 (with upbeat) was inaccurately reproduced in GE1 due to the transition into a new line. Both in FE (→EE) and GE2 the inaccuracy was removed, by adjusting the correct 1st part of the slur (in bars 82-83) to the erroneous slur in bar 84. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , FE revisions |
