data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The returning e
3 in the descending fragment of the roulade is absent in all sources, which is undoubtedly Chopin's mistake. EE added flats restoring e
2 and d
2 at the end of the bar – an addition justified in the original notation with the use of an octave sign in the uppermost fragment of the roulade.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions
issues: EE revisions, Omissions to cancel alteration
notation: Pitch