![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Page:
Source:
p. 6, b. 105-114
A - Autograph of the piano part
Prezentacja
Select
![](/build/images/x_button.png)
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
cresc. written into FED, probable reading |
![]() |
![]() |
dim. written into FED, possible reading |
![]() |
![]() |
Our variant suggestion |
The not too legible entry in FED is most probably a dynamic marking with a determined range of validity. According to us, it is probably cresc., yet dim. also seems to be possible.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: Annotations in teaching copies, Annotations in FED
notation: Verbal indications
Missing markers on sources:
GE1, A, GE1a, Morch, GE2, FE1, FE2, FES, FED, FEJ, EE1, EE2, EE3