![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Page:
Source:
p. 18, b. 268-286
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
![](/build/images/x_button.png)
According to us, omission of the additional quaver stem next to f1 is a result of the Chopin proofreading of FE (→EE), which is indicated by possible traces of correction in print in this place (e.g. a slightly bigger note head of the note). Taking into account the fact that in analogous bar 130 f
1 is not extended, one can come to a conclusion that Chopin could have written the fourth stem in the discussed bar by mistake.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Authentic corrections of FE
notation: Rhythm
Missing markers on sources:
GE1, A, GE1a, Morch, GE2, FE1, FE2, FES, FED, FEJ, EE1, EE2, EE3