Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Slurs

b. 59

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Slur in A

GE1 (→FEEE)

..

The slur of A is not absolutely unambiguous, yet its interpretation in GE1 (→FEEE) is certainly erroneous. The slur in GE2 may be considered an acceptable interpretation; however, in the main text we assume that in A each of six slurs in bars 59-62 embraces a motif made of four semiquavers and a crotchet. See also bar 61.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions

b. 61

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Slur in A

GE (→FE)

..

The slur of GE (→FE) is probably a result of a schematic interpretation of the notation of A, although from the musical point of view, it is absolutely possible. A shortened slur in EE is certainly an arbitrary revision.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE

b. 62

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 63-64

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Slur in A (contextual interpretation)

No slur in GE (→FEEE)

..

The slur, started in A in bar 63, the last on the page, was not finished on a new page. According to us, one should assume that Chopin's intention was to write in the part of the L.H. a slur of the same range as in the complete slur of the R.H.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , Errors of A

b. 71

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

In GE1 and in the remaining editions, the slur starts – contrary to A – only from the 1st semiquaver. The reason for this inaccuracy were most probably difficulties of a graphic character: moving the beginning of the slur facilitates a legible placement of all elements of notation accumulated in this space (inscriptions, an octave sign, a phrase mark, a tie, notes over the stave). Both notations are practically equal, hence we do not consider the difference to be an actual variant.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE