Pitch
|
b. 85
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
A typical Chopin oversight – a missing category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , Cautionary accidentals , Errors of A , FE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 93
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of A |
||||||
|
b. 93
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Traces of erasures and concentration of the notes visible in A in the 2nd half of the roulade prove the fact it was being extended at the time A was written. According to us, originally the group included 15 notes and its 2nd half was the same as in bar 85. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Main-line changes |
||||||
|
b. 94
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
|
b. 98
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
An additional c2 note could have been added by Chopin in the proofreading of GE1 (→FE→EE). The melodic line of the accompaniment, where the second quaver of each pair is higher than the previous dyad or chord, suggests that the note was probably to be sustained, which was then performed in the proofreading of FE (→EE). It cannot be excluded that the additional c2 was printed in GE1 by mistake and left unnecessarily after having added the correct note, a In the main text we give the version of FE as intended or accepted by Chopin. The version of A may be considered an equal variant, whereas the version of GE1 is almost certainly erroneous. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of GE , Partial corrections |
restoring e
2 – was not corrected in any of the editions. It is particularly bizarre in 
before e2 was removed, unnecessarily repeated on the 4th semiquaver in 
