Issues : Errors of A
|
b. 278
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , Errors of A |
|
|
b. 287
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Same as in analogous bar 139, in A Chopin overlooked the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , Errors of A |
|
|
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
There is no accidental before the 7th quaver in the sources, which makes us interpret it as f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A |
|
|
b. 299-300
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A Chopin forgot to return the bass clef in bar 300. GE1 overlooked also the treble clef in bar 299. The mistakes were corrected – perhaps by Chopin – in FE (→EE). GE2 also includes the correct text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|
|
b. 319-320
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Same as in analogous bars 169-170, in A (→GE) there are no flats restoring a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
restoring a
. This patent mistake – cf. analogous bar 130 – remained unnoticed by Chopin both during the proofreading and lessons. Revisers of the editions also did not notice it.
returning f1 is proved by f1 present in the viola part in 
and e1 instead of d