Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 139
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The omission of the mordent in FE (→EE1) is certainly a mistake – it is hard to imagine that Chopin could have not noticed the remaining mistakes while possibly removing the ornament. However, it should be emphasised that in FED Chopin did not add category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
||||||
|
b. 139
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A Chopin overlooked the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , Errors of A |
||||||
|
b. 139
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing staccato dots in the 2nd half of the bar is one of numerous errors of FE in this bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||
|
b. 143
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing accent in FE (→EE) is most probably an oversight. In GE2, the long accent, quite accurately reproduced in GE1, was changed to a much longer category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||
|
b. 143
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
GE1 (→FE1) has G as the 1st quaver. Chopin corrected this mistake in the proofreading of FE2 (→EE). The correct version was introduced also in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
in 
restoring a
1, which was not noticed in any of the editions. Similarly in analogous 
in