Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
b. 111
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 135
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
b. 138
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The tie of e2 was added by Chopin in the proofreading of FE (→EE) as one of the three additions in the 2nd half of the bar (cf. notes on pedalling and sempre legato). It is a characteristic Chopin pianistic procedure, ensuring strict legato of a melody led in chords (cf. e.g. the Polonaise in Amajor, Op. 53, bar 97). We suggest this change also in bar 286. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 138
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Chopin added the pedalling in the proofreading of FE (→EE). It is a third addition – next to the tie of e2 and sempre legato – introduced in this proofreading. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 139
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Chopin added sempre legato in the proofreading of FE, probably considering the accompaniment in this and two subsequent bars, devoid of slurs, requiring more precise articulation – in an analogous place in the recapitulation the L.H. is provided with slurs. In EE, in which the slurs were added here, sempre legato was omitted, which can be regarded as a rational solution, compliant with economy of indications, generally characteristic for the Chopin notation. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Legato & slurs |