



Pitch
b. 287
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
FE has an erroneous g as the last quaver in the L.H. In EE the mistake was corrected, most probably on the basis of comparison with analogous bar 139. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
||||||
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A (→GE1→FE) there are no accidentals in the last group of semiquavers. In EE the necessary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
||||||
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
There is no accidental before the 7th quaver in the sources, which makes us interpret it as f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A |
||||||
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→EE1→EE2) there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED |
||||||
b. 290
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
One can see a Chopin proofreading in the well-sounding version of GE (→FE→EE). However, an oversight of the engraver of GE1 also cannot be excluded; the engraver could have been influenced by the notation of the previous bar, including this type of coincidence of the voices at the beginning of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th group of semiquavers. Due to this reason, in the main text we give the version of A. However, the version of the editions, perhaps the latest authentic one, must be considered an equal variant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of GE |