![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors of A
b. 85
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
A typical Chopin oversight – a missing category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , Cautionary accidentals , Errors of A , FE revisions |
|
b. 93
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of A |
|
b. 105-107
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the sources there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|
b. 107
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A (→GE1→FE) the dot extending the value of the crotchet was inadvertently written next to f1. The mistake was corrected in EE and GE2. The traces of erasures visible in A suggest that Chopin first inadvertently wrote dots next to both notes and then he mistook them again, deleting the one that should have stayed. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A |
|
b. 107-108
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A (→GE1→FE→EE1→EE2) there is neither a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |