Issues : Errors in GE
|
b. 272
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Chopin added the e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 272
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1 (→FE→EE) the long accent present in A was overlooked. The accent was restored in GE2 but as a short one. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 273
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 274
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur of the bottom voice, appearing in GE instead of the slur of the top voice written in A, is probably a mistake, although its addition by Chopin cannot be entirely excluded (e.g. if in the proof copy no slur was included, Chopin could have added two and the engraver only the bottom one). In any case, in the proofreading of FE (→EE) Chopin restored the top slur, without removing the bottom one, so that next to the version of A one can also notice the version of FE with two slurs. In the main text we give the version of A, since the authenticity of the bottom slur is not as unquestionable as of the top one; moreover, the top slur applies to the entire part of the R.H. by default. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 275
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A (→GE1→FE→EE) there are no accidentals before the 6th and 10th notes of the roulade (in relation to a notation with an octave sign in Chopin's times, a possible sign was required only before the 6th note). Formally speaking, it should read b category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
1 in 
suggested by the editors
