Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 252
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing in the editions certainly do not correspond with Chopin's intention. The engraver of GE1 may have considered that it would be impossible to reproduce the sign written on notes in A in print. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||||
b. 255
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
All minor differences in the range of this sign appearing in the editions are certainly of random nature. In this case, the sign certainly means a "very long" accent, hence shifts both in GE1 and GE2 distorted its sense. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 258
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 259-260
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the sources the only performance marking in these bars is a hairpin. The later additions of slurs in the proofreading of GE1 (the L.H.) and FE1 (the R.H.) prove that it is an inaccuracy, which Chopin himself tried to correct (although randomly). Therefore, in the main text we suggest adding accents and slurs after bars 257-258. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 261
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |