![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
b. 141
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur's starting moment raises doubts in the sources. Perhaps the slur of A, according to Chopin's intention, was to embrace only two notes of the top voice, which was so clearly marked in the recapitulation (bar 289). On the other hand, the slur of A, interpreted literally, as well as the version of the editions may also be considered an expression of the composer's intention:
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||||
b. 142-143
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The inaccurate slur of A, when interpreted literally, embraces only the group of small quavers and c2. However, the shape of the slur clearly suggests that it is supposed to reach b category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 144
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Even if we consider the sign of A to be category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 145
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The earlier division of the slur in the editions is certainly a result of distraction of the engraver of GE1, who, seeing a similarly shaped group of four notes, gave a third consecutive four-note slur. The slurs probably indicate here the following rhythmic grouping of this 18-note figure: 4-4-5-5. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 145
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The too early placed category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |