![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Annotations in FED
b. 148-149
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In spite of the correction of the slur of A, which Chopin extended to the g1 crotchet, the editions embraced with it only the group of small notes. Chopin restored the correct phrasing with an entry in FED. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Inaccuracies in GE , Corrections in A |
|||||
b. 149
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur of A, when interpreted literally, seems to start from the beginning of the bar and this is how it was reproduced in the editions. However, both the previous slur, led to the beginning of this bar, and con duolo placed only over the second crotchet suggest that the new musical thought should begin just from the second crotchet. The intuition is confirmed by the Chopin entry in FED, in which the ending of the slur added over the roulade in bar 148 clearly separates the g1 crotchet from the further course of music. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||
b. 149
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In FED,
It is also unclear what a possible deletion could mean. If not category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Source & stylistic information |
|||||
b. 150
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The fingering written to FED certainly comes from Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 151
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The fingering added in FED probably comes from Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources |