In A it is unclear whether the end of the slur from bar 290 is written just with aplomb or whether it is supposed to reach the 1st semiquaver in bar 291. In the main text we assume the latter; in turn, not only was the slur ended on the last semiquaver in bar 290 in the editions, but also a next one was started from the 1st note in bar 291, clearly contrary to the notation of A.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in GE, Inaccurate slurs in A
notation: Slurs
