|
3 slurs in A, probable interpretation |
|
|
||
|
Combining the slurs over the rest in bar 288, as it was done in GE1 (→FE→EE), may be considered to be justified in this case – the slurs in A look like an inaccurately written one slur. In GE2 the manuscript was interpreted correctly. In turn, in the very A the slurring of the junction of the bars, which are written on adjacent pages, is unclear. The slur in bar 288 suggests a continuation, which is not excluded at all by the slur in bar 289. However, when discussed separately, the second slur seems to be a typical slur combining a grace note with a semiquaver associated with it, hence we consider such an interpretation to be more likely and we adopt it as the text of A and the main text.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in GE
notation: Slurs
