b. 83-85
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The shortened hairpin in bars 83 and 85 is certainly an inaccuracy of GE (→FE→EE). The figure – or its variant – appears four times (bars 83, 85, 91 and 93) and each time the sign embraces in A four quavers. In the editions, only in bar 91 the sign was reproduced correctly. In EE, due to a very dense placement of notes, the hairpin in bar 83 took the form of an accent. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 84
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A one can see a correction of the group of semiquavers. The six-note version of this motif was removed, such as used by Chopin in bar 92. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Main-line changes |
||||||||
b. 84
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The version of the editions is undoubtedly erroneous, which is proved by the Chopin correction in FED, restoring the text of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error |
||||||||
b. 85
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
A typical Chopin oversight – a missing restoring e2 – was not corrected in any of the editions. It is particularly bizarre in FE where the before e2 was removed, unnecessarily repeated on the 4th semiquaver in A (→GE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , Cautionary accidentals , Errors of A , FE revisions |
||||||||
b. 85
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |