Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 67-93
p. 1
p. 2
p. 3, b. 1-30
p. 4, b. 31-66
p. 5, b. 67-93
p. 6, b. 94-124
p. 7, b. 125-152
p. 8, b. 153-181
p. 9, b. 182-214
p. 10, b. 215-241
GC - Gutmann's Copy
Main text
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second impression of FE
FE3 - Third impression of FE
FE4 - Fourth impression of FE
FESch - Scherbatoff Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected reprint of GE
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second impression of FE
FE3 - Third impression of FE
FE4 - Fourth impression of FE
FESch - Scherbatoff Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected reprint of GE
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF GC - Gutmann's Copy


  b. 92

f2-d3 in GC (→GE) & FE3 (→FE4)

f2-f3 in FE1 (→FE2EE)

The version of FE1 (→FE2EE) is certainly erroneous – it is proved both by the text of GC (→GE) and the proofreading of FE3 (→FE4). At the same time, it is only FE4 that includes a completely correct text, as FE3 overlooked the  before the corrected note.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE, Terzverschreibung error, Errors in the number of ledger lines, Authentic corrections of FE

notation: Pitch

Missing markers on sources: FESch, FED, FES