Issues : Errors in GE
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of in FE (→EE) must be considered an inaccuracy of notation. Most likely, it is a non-corrected oversight of the engraver, although one cannot entirely exclude the possibility that the sign was added by Chopin in GC. In turn, no in GE1 is a patent oversight. See also bars 5 and 18-19. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: No initial dynamic marking , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||||
b. 2-3
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, out of two sources based directly on [A] – GC and FE – it is the copy that may convey a more accurate representation of this place in the autograph, since the text in FE is too tightly packed. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of in GE must be considered an oversight of the engraver – cf. bar 1 (in this context it is the lack of addition of the sign in GE2 that is surprising). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The f-b-d1 chord in GE1 is certainly an engraver's error. Moreover, the mistake changed the meaning of the slur which became a tie to f. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In GC (→GE) there is no sign at the beginning of the bar. It is a patent error – all sources include a at the end of bar 15. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Errors of GC |