Issues : Authentic corrections in GC
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of in FE (→EE) must be considered an inaccuracy of notation. Most likely, it is a non-corrected oversight of the engraver, although one cannot entirely exclude the possibility that the sign was added by Chopin in GC. In turn, no in GE1 is a patent oversight. See also bars 5 and 18-19. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: No initial dynamic marking , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||
b. 5-8
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The slur over this four-bar section could have been added by Chopin in GC (→GE) or overlooked by the engraver of FE (→EE). It seems to be highly unlikely that Chopin intentionally removed this sign. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||
b. 43-46
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The signs in bars 43-44 and 46 were probably added in GC (→GE) by Chopin. The latter was added later also in EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||
b. 44
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The slur over the bass motif was most probably added in GC (→GE) by Chopin, together with the hairpins in bars 43-44 and 46. On the basis of GE it was added also in EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||
b. 52-53
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections in GC |