Issues : FE revisions
b. 149-150
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
Similarly as in the previous bars, GC and FE1 (→FE2→FE3) lack seven accidentals before the notes which were previously already correctly written in another octave. These patent inaccuracies do not impede the interpretation and they were completed in the subsequent sources to a varied extent (including FED, in which a before the top note of the 3rd crotchet in bar 150 was added). It is only EE2 that has the fully correct text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||
b. 153
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
FE1 has no sign here. It is undoubtedly an oversight by the engraver – the sign was added in FE2 (→EE,FE3→FE4), and is present in GC (→GE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||||
b. 155
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , FE revisions |
|||||
b. 155
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
There is no accidental before the top note of the 2nd quaver in GC and FE1 (→FE2→FE3). The patent inaccuracy was corrected in the remaining sources. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||
b. 161
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The version of FE1 is most probably a mistake (corrected in FE2 and subsequent FE), as in GC one can see no traces of corrections in this place. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |