![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in GE
b. 87-88
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The slurs of GE are certainly erroneous. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
When interpreted literally, the last chord's 2nd note from top in GE1 is a d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 91
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The wedge in GC is very clear, so both the omission of the sign in GE1 and the fact of replacing it with a dot in GE2 are surprising. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
||||||||
b. 91-92
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The fact that the slur in GE1 begins later must be a mistake of the engraver; he omitted the part of the slur falling on b. 91, which ends the line. The error was corrected in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |