GC
compare
b. 91-92
The fact that the slur in GE1 begins later must be a mistake of the engraver; he omitted the part of the slur falling on b. 91, which ends the line. The error was corrected in GE2.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in GE, GE revisions
notation: Slurs