mUltimate Chopin

Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Verbal indications
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Verbal indications

b. 226

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

No indication in GC & FE (→EE1)

 in GE & EE2
..

The  indication here results from a mistake by the engraver of GE1, who interpreted thus the  sign hurriedly written in GC. The erroneous indication was repeated in EE2.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in GC

b. 232-234

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

No indication in GC (→GE)

in bar 232 in FE

in bars 232-234 in EE
..

The version of FE is most probably accidental – the engraver forgot about the dashes in the new line of the text. The addition in EE may come from Chopin, although it cannot be excluded that according to Chopin, the crescendo was supposed to be led until  in bar 239.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of EE