![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Terzverschreibung error
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 92
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The version of FE1 (→FE2→EE) is certainly erroneous – it is proved both by the text of GC (→GE) and the proofreading of FE3 (→FE4). At the same time, it is only FE4 that includes a completely correct text, as FE3 overlooked the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , Errors in the number of ledger lines , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 93
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
At the beginning of the bar GC has a C1-E tenth. It is certainly a mistake, which is proved by, among others, the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Errors in the number of ledger lines , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 128
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The version with e3 present in FE1 (→FE2→EE1) (in both FE without the necessary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in GC , Annotations in FESch |
|||||
b. 148
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The version of GE1 is certainly a mistake of the engraver, corrected in GE2. The bottom note of this dyad is devoid of natural in GC, FE and GE1, which in all of the cases is a patent error. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 155
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The structure of the figuration in the entire passage in the L.H. (bars 153-156 and 157-160), and particularly the comparison with analogous bar 159, indicate a mistake of the copyist in this place. The absence of a correction in GE may be attributed to the absent category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Terzverschreibung error , Errors of GC |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »