Issues : FE revisions
|
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
B category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 26-27
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The oversight of the engraver of FE1 – he overlooked three slurs at the beginning of a new line, similarly as accents – was completed in the later FE, yet inaccurately (a too short 2nd slur in bar 26). In this case, the very careless slurs of GC did not mislead the engraver of GE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||
|
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
[A] most probably included wedges, as Gutmann considered them to be staccato dots on a number of occasions (cf., e.g., the Etude in F major, Op. 25 No. 3, bars 49-52). Chopin wedges were actually often misinterpreted as dots also by the engravers, in turn, misinterpretation of dots as wedges was almost inexistent. Therefore, in the main text we give wedges, added in FE2 (→EE,FE3→FE4) most probably on the basis of [A]. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions , Wedges , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||
|
b. 44-48
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In bars 44 and 48 FE1 has no naturals before the 2nd crotchet. A double mistake of the engraver is proved by the flats before the last notes in these bars. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 70
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of the middle notes of the chord at the beginning of the bar is certainly an oversight of the engraver of FE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
in 
