![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
b. 161-162
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The version with d
The tie between both notes d Therefore, we regard as correct only the version with c introduced into FE2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||||||
b. 162-165
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The pedalling of FE (→EE) is less accurate, while in bar 164 it is certainly erroneous (no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||
b. 169
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The tie visible in GC before the chord means an arpeggio in this context. The version of GE, repeated then in EE2, is a result of a routine revision – the sign was moved to the side of the note head of the d1 grace note, which gave it a form of a tie sustaining the grace note (cf. the note on the part of the L.H.). No slur in FE (→EE1) is most probably an oversight. FE1 includes an erroneous c1 as the grace note, which was corrected in the next impressions. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 169
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The comparison with GC and later correction in FE2 prove that the version of FE1 is erroneous. The omission of f was probably the reason of an inaccurate shortening of the slur of the grace note. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 172
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
FE has no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of EE |