data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
It is not certain whether the dot, visible in GC near the bottom note of the 1st octave in the bar, is a staccato dot or an insignificant ink fleck. The sign is absent in all other sources, which, however, cannot be considered to be a conclusive argument. In the main text we include the dot, as the staccato articulation results here in a natural way from the piano texture, as well as due to the similarly marked chord at the beginning of bar 91.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in GE
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins