data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
EE2
compare
In the main text we include written in GC (→GE) and then repeated in EE2. No sign in FE (→EE1) is probably an accident, as it seems to be highly unlikely that Chopin wanted to leave the idea of emphasising with a dynamic sign a place in which the melodic climax combines with a harmonic breakthrough (reaching the dominant in the general key). Cf. notes on
signs in bars 153-156 and 158-160.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
notation: Verbal indications